Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom is a model that we have all used at some point to help an audience usefully distinguish between different aspects of what we do.
Thanks Matt! Based on the introduction we're aiming at the same thing, I'll have to read it later and see if we ended up in anything like the same place, obviously it's much better researched than my post is. Thanks for sharing it - one of those great moments where I wish I'd read it before I wrote the post.
This is the most detailed discussion and critique of DIKW of which I am aware: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fde0/d2b7da419d66f1cdbc7cce8ff37116254cf3.pdf?_ga=2.4577587.1434888394.1637978476-1280921422.1634964572
Thanks Matt! Based on the introduction we're aiming at the same thing, I'll have to read it later and see if we ended up in anything like the same place, obviously it's much better researched than my post is. Thanks for sharing it - one of those great moments where I wish I'd read it before I wrote the post.
One of the easiest ways to get other people to do your research is to post something online and have everyone disagree with you.
What else is online for?